About PPI Patient Reports
PPI Patient Reports is an independent archive of patient-reported proton pump inhibitor experience: real-world symptoms, treatment duration, side effects, conditions, supplements, and source-linked discussion posts brought together into one structured database.
Founder
Eugen Sunic (34)
I created this project from scratch, from the original database concept to the collection process, content structure, and public-facing product.
My interest in the subject started after a short period of personal PPI use for gastritis. The condition resolved, but the gap between published research, patient experience, and everyday prescribing decisions stayed obvious.
Proton pump inhibitors became widely debated after kidney-related studies received broad attention. Since then, the literature and online discussion around PPIs has expanded sharply, yet most of the useful patient-level detail remains fragmented across forums, comment sections, articles, and scattered case discussions.
PPI Patient Reports exists to organize that fragmented information into something searchable, structured, and commercially viable: a content asset that can rank, inform, and monetize through data-driven pages rather than generic health listicles.
Contact: eugen.sunic@gmail.com · LinkedIn — English, French, Croatian.
Project focus
What the site does
The core of the site is a curated archive of internet posts where patients describe their experience with PPIs in detail. The key inclusion criterion was treatment duration. If a post did not specify time on the drug, it was not included.
That rule matters because duration is what turns loose anecdotes into something you can compare across symptoms, conditions, dosage patterns, and long-term use.
On top of that archive, the site adds structured browsing for side effects, conditions, supplements, research, FAQs, and anonymous patient submissions. The goal is simple: make PPI-related information easier to discover, easier to interpret, and easier to monetize responsibly.
Main archive
1,200+
Patient and community posts collected and structured.
FAQ coverage
137
Questions and answers built for search intent and education.
Editorial standard
How the content is handled
- Every collected post is source-linked, with date and username preserved where available.
- Most FAQ entries are referenced so readers can trace the claim back to its source.
- Posts are lightly cleaned for syntax and readability, but their meaning is not changed.
- Statistics are generated from the stored database rather than manually edited summary numbers.
- The patient input form does not request names, email addresses, or identifying personal data.
- The project is editorially independent and not operated on behalf of a pharmaceutical company.